Richard Jakpa, the third accused person in the ongoing ambulance procurement case, has defended the integrity of the process, emphasizing that both Cabinet and Parliament conducted rigorous due diligence before approving the procurement.
His statement comes in response to legal challenges questioning the transparency and integrity of the procurement procedures, raised by Attorney-General and Minister for Justice Godfred Yeboah Dame on Tuesday.
Jakpa asserted that the approval process involved meticulous scrutiny at multiple levels to ensure compliance with all required standards and specifications.
He highlighted comprehensive evaluations, including cost assessments and technical reviews, aimed at securing the best value for public funds and ensuring high-quality service delivery in the health sector.
The prosecution, initiated by the Attorney-General, alleges potential irregularities in the procurement process and suggests financial loss to the state due to discrepancies in pricing and quality of the ambulances.
In court, Jakpa presented detailed documentation, including meeting minutes, evaluation reports, and official correspondence, to substantiate the thoroughness of the process and the government’s commitment to transparency.
He maintained that the entire procurement process adhered strictly to national laws and international best practices, assuring the court of the government’s commitment to accountability in public procurement.